2024 Early Bird Draft Thread

[Meks]

Originally Posted by That Guy

I think SH should be on the roster, but good luck selling a fanbase that you're taking a tackle instead of a high rated QB when we're in position to get one. If you do that and SH poops the bed again, everyone's going to be screaming to fire everyone.

You're not wrong. As much as everyone hated Dan, a lot of them sure have his patience. 🤷

[CRedskinsRule]

So we have a very early night watching day 1 of the draft And a late night draft party on Friday!

edit:

I actually think we will take some of those day two picks and trade up back into mid to late day one

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

[AnonEmouse]

I like the idea of trading back up for a T in round 1 or getting more picks in 2 & 3 to grab 2 of them, a CB and a TE. I don't like the idea of moving up to #1.

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by AnonEmouse

I like the idea of trading back up for a T in round 1 or getting more picks in 2 & 3 to grab 2 of them, a CB and a TE. I don't like the idea of moving up to #1.

We seriously need help on our OL beyond C, which we secured in FA. It was a huge reason to Howell's lack of progression.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Yeah I totally agree, but I wonder if they had gotten Sam Darnold, who was first choice over the shit show Mariota, what the response would have been here.

With Mariota, it seals it for me that QB 1 will be taken at 2. But if it was Darnold, then I probably be thinking trade down/WR at 2.

Come on man. Sam Darnold? I would want him far away from the field too. Not as far as Mariota but far. I am not passing on this draft class for Sam Darnold. If anything we trade back into the first and grab an OT. If not we get him on day two. Five picks and still alot of areas of need , TE, WR, OT x 2, G, CB, Edge, FS. All needs. Some more than others but all needs. It is amazing what Rivera did to this roster that we could go get 8-10 new starters and still have so many areas of need.

[CRedskinsRule]

would you trade picks 35, 40 and a 5th to jump way up if one of the 3 top tackles falls below 10 overall?

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

[EdmundDorf]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

would you trade picks 35, 40 and a 5th to jump way up if one of the 3 top tackles falls below 10 overall?

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

Yes, without a doubt

[skinsfaninok]

I cant wait for the draft to be over lol. All the Caleb , JD , Maye talk finally ends

[EdmundDorf]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

I cant wait for the draft to be over lol. All the Caleb , JD , Maye talk finally ends

Yep I have had enough of reading articles and opinions comparing those guys, I will leave it to the FO to find the right one. I am far more interested in what is going to happen with the 2nd and 3rd rounders, much more intrigue and so many options, this draft is going to be fun.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

would you trade picks 35, 40 and a 5th to jump way up if one of the 3 top tackles falls below 10 overall?

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

Yup

[Meks]

Good read on CW negatives. Watched some of the film and agree with the points here. No fuckin thanks. Please no.

https://firstroundmock.com/2024/01/f...ams-is-a-bust/

I'm literally not sure I saw him look off a single defender. Locks on way too much... he's an athlete with an arm. That's it. Again, please no.

[Chief X_Phackter]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

would you trade picks 35, 40 and a 5th to jump way up if one of the 3 top tackles falls below 10 overall?

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

While we're getting crazy, why not just trade next year's 1st, along with this year's #40 and #78 and jump into the top 10 and take the top Tackle?

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter

While we're getting crazy, why not just trade next year's 1st, along with this year's #40 and #78 and jump into the top 10 and take the top Tackle?

i tried to make it a reasonable trade scenario points wise. fact is with so many qbs and wr's likely going in the top ten a top tackle or two may fall down past ten which is at least reachable

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

[Chief X_Phackter]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

i tried to make it a reasonable trade scenario points wise. fact is with so many qbs and wr's likely going in the top ten a top tackle or two may fall down past ten which is at least reachable

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

I thought my proposal was also a reasonable trade scenario points wise. Maybe even too rich... Assuming we just miss the playoffs, next year's 1st (287), along with this year's #40 (149) and #78 (59) = 495 points.

The #4 pick is worth 491. The #9 pick is worth 387 points.

But you are right, it's very possible a top tackle is there between 10-15. The last mock draft I saw had OTs going at 7, 10, and 14 with my favorite tackle, Olu Fashanu, going at 14.

[Darrell Green Fan]

No way I would support trading next year's first. This is a deep tackle draft, there is no reason to trade that much to be able to land a good one.