Supreme Court vacancy

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

A month ago Romney was the step child of the Republican party and Trump campaign today not so much

Simply Amazing

The hypocrisy of both sides around all this is

SIMPLY AMAZING

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Ehhh, not the same. I don’t see the same fawning or criticism when it’s visa versa. Also sitting president of your party, I think expect more criticism from within than stating a position on an issue.

[SunnySide]

I imagine conservatives view controlling the SC for 2 reasons.

1. abolish abortion
2. run to Courts to stop anything a Dem president or legislature passes.

Re abortion .. do conservatives really think abolishing abortion is a winning strategy going forward? Their hardcore religious base may finally get their wish .. but I just dont see many new voters or independents joining a party that puts religion above politics and the Constitution.

re SC to block Dem laws ... if this happens repeatedly and it becomes apparent that the conservative SC is not applying the law but now just a political branch serving just conservatives ... wont that be the end of the SC? Why wouldnt Dems just add 43 new justices and make the SC the theatre of the absurd? Wouldnt the deference to the SC be greatly diminished in the eyes of Americans?

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by SunnySide

I imagine conservatives view controlling the SC for 2 reasons.



1. abolish abortion

2. run to Courts to stop anything a Dem president or legislature passes.



Re abortion .. do conservatives really think abolishing abortion is a winning strategy going forward? Their hardcore religious base may finally get their wish .. but I just dont see many new voters or independents joining a party that puts religion above politics and the Constitution.



re SC to block Dem laws ... if this happens repeatedly and it becomes apparent that the conservative SC is not applying the law but now just a political branch serving just conservatives ... wont that be the end of the SC? Why wouldnt Dems just add 43 new justices and make the SC the theatre of the absurd? Wouldnt the deference to the SC be greatly diminished in the eyes of Americans?

Not touching #1. But #2 has been the Democratic party since Roosevelt.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Not touching #1. But #2 has been the Democratic party since Roosevelt.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

1. I'll touch it. Abortion is never getting overturned. Liberals will get to keep on murdering babies. This is liberal fearmongering playbook; play 1. Even before calling everyone a racist.

2. This was the biggest fucking projection post in Warpath history.

[Chico23231]

The RBG hero worship is cultish. It’s fucking weird.

Funny how the media has ignored some of her less “woke” opinions over the last couple years. Very hypocritical, but pathetic as well

[SunnySide]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

1. I'll touch it. Abortion is never getting overturned. Liberals will get to keep on murdering babies. This is liberal fearmongering playbook; play 1. Even before calling everyone a racist.

2. This was the biggest fucking projection post in Warpath history.

lol ... good talk fellas.

The only thing missing is a conservative screaming that I cant take part in honest discussions without resorting to name calling.

Theres still time. I have faith in you guys.

[MTK]

lol let's talk about weird cults

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by SunnySide

lol ... good talk fellas.

The only thing missing is a conservative screaming that I cant take part in honest discussions without resorting to name calling.

Theres still time. I have faith in you guys.

Chico, that's up to you. Unless BuffaloBob makes a comeback.

That's my 1 post on the subject.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by SunnySide

I imagine conservatives view controlling the SC for 2 reasons.

1. abolish abortion
2. run to Courts to stop anything a Dem president or legislature passes.

Re abortion .. do conservatives really think abolishing abortion is a winning strategy going forward? Their hardcore religious base may finally get their wish .. but I just dont see many new voters or independents joining a party that puts religion above politics and the Constitution.

re SC to block Dem laws ... if this happens repeatedly and it becomes apparent that the conservative SC is not applying the law but now just a political branch serving just conservatives ... wont that be the end of the SC? Why wouldnt Dems just add 43 new justices and make the SC the theatre of the absurd? Wouldnt the deference to the SC be greatly diminished in the eyes of Americans?

Too me, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, due process, etc is where most see the most threats by folks who want the government to step in and regulate/restrict both. Liberal lobby groups have thrown a lot of money at getting rid of religious issues...you can’t argue that, simply fact...across many states.

You guys hate the freedom part of civil liberties and want big brother.

A lot of people/media go 2nd amendment, Abortion, etc, but I don’t.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by MTK

lol let's talk about weird cults

Yeah, Obama worship is a very real thing as well.

But a Supreme Court justice?

Strange...weird. Cultish AF

[SunnySide]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Too me, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, due process, etc is where most see the most threats by folks who want the government to step in and regulate/restrict both. Liberal lobby groups have thrown a lot of money at getting rid of religious issues...you can’t argue that, simply fact...across many states.

You guys hate the freedom part of civil liberties and want big brother.

A lot of people/media go 2nd amendment, Abortion, etc, but I don’t.

With the freedom of religion - im somewhat naive to that bc im not religious. With Hobby Lobby not wanting to be forced to cover birth control, I agreed with Hobby Lobby on that and I could see where they were coming from. With a valedictorian of a public school wanting to thank god or spend a min or so of a 10 min speech on god, im fine with that.

I am against school sponsored prayer, I am for allowing students gather and do religious type things after hours on school property.
--------------
The U.S. Supreme Court banned school-sponsored prayer in public schools in a 1962 decision, saying that it violated the First Amendment. But students are allowed to meet and pray on school grounds as long as they do so privately and don't try to force others to do the same.

The group included William McLeod, a 9-year-old Utah boy who was forced to remove the cross of ashes from his forehead on Ash Wednesday. "I just don't want anyone to feel like that," McLeod said.

It said there has been an increasing number of reports of schools promoting prayer in ways that cross the line — such as an Alabama high school where a student football team was baptized at school.

Joseph Kennedy, a Washington state high school football coach who lost his job after he refused to stop praying on the field after games.
https://www.npr.org/2020/01/16/79686...yer-in-schools
--------------------

I do not think the kid on Ash Wednesday should have been forced to remove the ask cross from his forehead.

The coach holding prayer sessions after football games ... Im torn on that one bc i could see students feel like they need to participate even though they are not religious. Others will say its after the game and voluntary .. but if the coach felt so strong about it here that he wouldnt stop and lost his job for it ... is it really a stretch to imagine he would view or bench a player who didnt take part or who said he doesnt believe in god?

The religious thing always gets me ... bc to me what is the big fucking deal? as long as my kid isnt subject to a morning prayer, I dont care.

-------------

When was the last time you went to church?

[Chico23231]

Weekly I attend to church.

If u only knew of the mountain of sin I’ve committed...gotta whittle it away daily.

[Chico23231]

https://www.dailywire.com/news/newsw...handmaids-tale

Newsweek makes retraction on fake news story about Amy Barrett.

It’s not even announced and media is already spreading lies about potential candidates. That’s why they’ve earned the title “Enemy of the People “

[CRedskinsRule]

It is going to be ugly for whoever Trump nominates. I feel very sorry for them in advance. With a woman most of the stories(lies) will likely be racially geared or hyper anti christian like the handmaid one.

Anything to create delay and diversion..

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[RedskinMike]

Originally Posted by MTK

lol let's talk about weird cults

Wish there was a like button. I would click it 45 times.