The Most Fresh & Cordial Political Thread Ever

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by jamf

All this trouble because you nut jobs believe Mary was a virgin and Jesus was a white man.
Santa isn't real either you dopes!

Wait , what??? WTF!!! I bet you go to little kids birthday parties and blow out the candles on the cake!

[SunnySide]

Originally Posted by jamf

All this trouble because you nut jobs believe Mary was a virgin and Jesus was a white man.
Santa isn't real either you dopes!

Preach .... christian religion now being used to govern our country is so fucked up.

[MTK]

Fairy tales and legends.

[mooby]

I'm definitely pro-freedom of religion, I really want to turn the US into a religious state that follows the 7 fundamental tenets of The Satanic Temple. So thanks SCOTUS for finally empowering us religious types.

[nonniey]

Atheists can be and often are as fanatical as even the most fanatical religious person. Better to be an agnostic, no fanaticism there.

[nonniey]

"Democrats’ bad policies are responsible for today’s historic inflation"

"........Exhibit A: Trillions of dollars in reckless spending in 2021 when the economy was recovering led to too many dollars chasing too few goods. Exhibit B: The numerous government programs such as expanded unemployment insurance through most of 2021 that encouraged Americans not to work, reducing labor supply and pushing up costs.

Exhibit C: Radical green energy policies downstream from Biden’s “guarantee” on the campaign trail “to end fossil fuel” that reduced supply and drove up gas prices. Exhibit D: Support for easy money and Modern Monetary Theory policy that led to a historic expansion of the money supply and devalued the dollar......"

https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/...ric-inflation/

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by nonniey

"Democrats’ bad policies are responsible for today’s historic inflation"

"........Exhibit A: Trillions of dollars in reckless spending in 2021 when the economy was recovering led to too many dollars chasing too few goods. Exhibit B: The numerous government programs such as expanded unemployment insurance through most of 2021 that encouraged Americans not to work, reducing labor supply and pushing up costs.

Exhibit C: Radical green energy policies downstream from Biden’s “guarantee” on the campaign trail “to end fossil fuel” that reduced supply and drove up gas prices. Exhibit D: Support for easy money and Modern Monetary Theory policy that led to a historic expansion of the money supply and devalued the dollar......"

https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/...ric-inflation/

JHC! A) You do realize the republicans also had spending plans
B) AGAIN plans that were put into place to help Americans during a World Wide Pandemic shut down. But I get it the righteous right says to hell with working Americans.
C) LOL, so Biden made good on a campaign promise and it pissed big energy off, FT. He told people he would do exactly what he did, unlike trump he didn't lie.
D) LOL, that is just BS.

[Giantone]

Seriously chico ,Cred,SDSkins. How in the hell can you back a moron like this?

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/3...po-nyt-awards/


Pulitzers rejects Trump demand to revoke WaPo, NYT awards


The Pulitzer board commissioned a review of the winning works, but found no reason to pull back the awards.

“The separate reviews converged in their conclusions: that no passages or headlines, contentions or assertions in any of the winning submissions were discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prizes,” the board said in a statement.

“The 2018 Pulitzer Prizes in National Reporting stand,” the statement continued.

The board said the review followed an established, formal process to review complaints against winning entries.

Trump has pressed for the Pulitzers to be revoked since October, labeling the winning stories “totally incorrect reporting” that “have become worthless and meaningless.”

The board said the requests from Trump and others, who they did not name, prompted the reviews, which were conducted by individuals with no connection to the two papers or each other.

[nonniey]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Seriously chico ,Cred,SDSkins. How in the hell can you back a moron like this?

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/3...po-nyt-awards/


Pulitzers rejects Trump demand to revoke WaPo, NYT awards


The Pulitzer board commissioned a review of the winning works, but found no reason to pull back the awards.

“The separate reviews converged in their conclusions: that no passages or headlines, contentions or assertions in any of the winning submissions were discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prizes,” the board said in a statement.

“The 2018 Pulitzer Prizes in National Reporting stand,” the statement continued.

The board said the review followed an established, formal process to review complaints against winning entries.

Trump has pressed for the Pulitzers to be revoked since October, labeling the winning stories “totally incorrect reporting” that “have become worthless and meaningless.”

The board said the requests from Trump and others, who they did not name, prompted the reviews, which were conducted by individuals with no connection to the two papers or each other.

Not surprising as there are even worse awards that the board refuses to rescind (NYT's Duranty award is the top example of an egregious award that absolutely should have been rescinded - and the NYT still proudly claims that one in their stats). Oh and Trump wasn't the only one calling for those awards to be rescinded - Journalists from every side of the spectrum were.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by nonniey

Not surprising as there are even worse awards that the board refuses to rescind (NYT's Duranty award is the top example of an egregious award that absolutely should have been rescinded - and the NYT still proudly claims that one in their stats). Oh and Trump wasn't the only one calling for those awards to be rescinded - Journalists from every side of the spectrum were.

I know that but you have to acknowledge they reviewed it and still gave the finger to trump and the other liars.

[nonniey]

Originally Posted by Giantone

I know that but you have to acknowledge they reviewed it and still gave the finger to trump and the other liars.

Oh he is definitely a liar for the ages, but he wasn't lying on this issue. I still think that refusing to correct/rescind awards given for stories that were based on bad info or lies just further damages the press's reputation (and it already has dug itself to lowest point it has ever been. It needs to stop digging).

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Giantone

I know that but you have to acknowledge they reviewed it and still gave the finger to trump and the other liars.

Lol…as we know, there wasn’t any Russian collusion, the Steele dos was false and the liars were anyone in congress who claimed to had seen evidence trump colluded with russia.

We know from recent testimony that this was just Democrat oppo and the FBI review it and said there was no evidence long before Mueller came along.

The problem is this, if you are a respectable news organization you are suppose to present the facts and investigate the evidence. The NYT did not…only after the Muller report was released did they admit the Steele Dos was discredited

The NYT pushed a conspiracy theory and false narratives that aligned with their political biased simply because they didn’t like Trump.

Folks actually still believe this Russian collusion nonsense, which is the biggest disinformation political campaign of my lifetime.

And media wonders why we don’t believe them or why our faith in institutions are failing to record lows.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Lol…as we know, there wasn’t any Russian collusion, the Steele dos was false and the liars were anyone in congress who claimed to had seen evidence trump colluded with russia.

We know from recent testimony that this was just Democrat oppo and the FBI review it and said there was no evidence long before Mueller came along.

The problem is this, if you are a respectable news organization you are suppose to present the facts and investigate the evidence. The NYT did not…only after the Muller report was released did they admit the Steele Dos was discredited

The NYT pushed a conspiracy theory and false narratives that aligned with their political biased simply because they didn’t like Trump.

Folks actually still believe this Russian collusion nonsense, which is the biggest disinformation political campaign of my lifetime.

And media wonders why we don’t believe them or why our faith in institutions are failing to record lows.

LOL I love how you play the "collusion" BS . Mueller proved Russia intervened on trumps behalf and it was his kids that were the middle men Barr just wouldn't indicted.




What's this we shit??? .............you keep proving you know shit!

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by nonniey

Oh he is definitely a liar for the ages, but he wasn't lying on this issue. I still think that refusing to correct/rescind awards given for stories that were based on bad info or lies just further damages the press's reputation (and it already has dug itself to lowest point it has ever been. It needs to stop digging).

People who aren't in the industry need to stay out of things they don't know anything about and that includes telling them who should and should not get an award.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Giantone

LOL I love how you play the "collusion" BS . Mueller proved Russia intervened on trumps behalf and it was his kids that were the middle men Barr just wouldn't indicted.




What's this we shit??? .............you keep proving you know shit!

Lol…what? No Mueller didn’t …..and kids were middle man? What are you talking about?

G1, I sometimes picture you as the My Pillow Guy, but with the complete opposite behavior…Bizzaro My Pillow Guy. Instead of endearing love of Trump, you have complete disgust and hate. Instead of My Pillow, you have My Bedpan.