Media Bias

[Chico23231]

But shouldnt the media be presenting important information in a neutral manor and let the public decide? This is what the question is...the media should not be influencing the public by pompous sensationalize reporting that is mostly based on opinion and not facts. Plus using non-verified sources or just using anonymous sources seems like it leaves a lot of facts unchecked and assumptions to be made...

It's a fact the mainstream media is staunchly bias in this case.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Alvin Walton

I stopped reading once I realized its a trash website.

To a trump supporter any site is a "trash site" unless it follows the book of trump so the cult can follow.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

But shouldnt the media be presenting important information in a neutral manor and let the public decide? This is what the question is...the media should not be influencing the public by pompous sensationalize reporting that is mostly based on opinion and not facts. Plus using non-verified sources or just using anonymous sources seems like it leaves a lot of facts unchecked and assumptions to be made...

It's a fact the mainstream media is staunchly bias in this case.

I asked this question before and I will ask it again,what "MSM(main stream media) will you accept?Name the "news organization" you will listen to?
I also didn't get an answer about FOX reporting bad news on Trump 52% of the time,HELL .............even they know they can't keep the lies up anymore!

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

But shouldnt the media be presenting important information in a neutral manor and let the public decide? This is what the question is...the media should not be influencing the public by pompous sensationalize reporting that is mostly based on opinion and not facts. Plus using non-verified sources or just using anonymous sources seems like it leaves a lot of facts unchecked and assumptions to be made...

It's a fact the mainstream media is staunchly bias in this case.

That sounds nice but in reality media organizations exist to make money and as long as that is the case they will pick and choose the angle to report.

Also, we need to start separating credible places like the AP and Reuters from media that tries to pass op-eds off like they're actually news. The lines between news and opinions are being intentionally blurred because they are getting results. Yeah, I get my news from MSNBC, but I stick to articles they are publishing that were written by the AP or another credible company like Reuters.

[Alvin Walton]

Originally Posted by Giantone

To a trump supporter any site is a "trash site" unless it follows the book of trump so the cult can follow.

Every single article on the front page was about Trump.
Every single article was a negative article about Trump.
Duh......
Its just web space to have an anti Trump circle jerk, its not news.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Alvin Walton

Every single article on the front page was about Trump.
Every single article was a negative article about Trump.
Duh......
Its just web space to have an anti Trump circle jerk, its not news.

So what you're saying is, if Trump says something, or signs yet another bill/executive order, that's not news? Or the media shouldn't report it when he signs a bill or does something that directly contradicts something he said when Obama was president?

[Alvin Walton]

Originally Posted by mooby

So what you're saying is, if Trump says something, or signs yet another bill/executive order, that's not news? Or the media shouldn't report it when he signs a bill or does something that directly contradicts something he said when Obama was president?

No, thats not what I'm saying.
I'm saying that wasnt a credible news website.
I dont even know if I'd call it news.
It reads more like a John Podesta/Wolf Blitzer blog.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Alvin Walton

No, thats not what I'm saying.
I'm saying that wasnt a credible news website.
I dont even know if I'd call it news.
It reads more like a John Podesta/Wolf Blitzer blog.

I'm not gonna defend that website considering I don't consider them a reputable source either. But this convo sounds like the lines are being blurred between that site and the credible ones. But then again, the only credible ones nowadays are the AP/Reuters/maybe a couple others.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Alvin Walton

No, thats not what I'm saying.
I'm saying that wasnt a credible news website.
I dont even know if I'd call it news.
It reads more like a John Podesta/Wolf Blitzer blog.

Here knock yourself out.The news is the exact same!

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/10/u...cked.html?_r=0


Trump Bars U.S. Reporters From Meeting With Russian Officials : NPR


https://www.wsj.com/articles/white-h...als-1494890345

[Alvin Walton]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Here knock yourself out.The news is the exact same!

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/10/u...cked.html?_r=0


Trump Bars U.S. Reporters From Meeting With Russian Officials : NPR


https://www.wsj.com/articles/white-h...als-1494890345

Yea yea...saw it on some other websites too.
But thanks for being there for me sweetheart.
And not the first time he's kicked reporters out.
In most cases they deserve it.

Doesnt change anything though, the left driven media sucks monkey ass.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Alvin Walton

Yea yea...saw it on some other websites too.
But thanks for being there for me sweetheart.
And not the first time he's kicked reporters out.
In most cases they deserve it.

Doesnt change anything though, the left driven media sucks monkey ass.

Ok so you agree it's not the messenger but the message that is the problem and that falls on Trump.

[Alvin Walton]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Ok so you agree it's not the messenger but the message that is the problem and that falls on Trump.

LOL....no, I dont agree at all.
I totally support how Trump treats the media.
The problem falls on the media.
See previous posts where I state that the left driven media sucks red baboon ass.
The media doesn't show up at the White House to get news.
They show up to hopefully get dirt on Trump and the Republican party.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Alvin Walton

LOL....no, I dont agree at all.
I totally support how Trump treats the media.
The problem falls on the media.
See previous posts where I state that the left driven media sucks red baboon ass.
The media doesn't show up at the White House to get news.
They show up to hopefully get dirt on Trump and the Republican party.

Maybe Trump and the republican party should stop giving them the dirt(news) to write about and go about running the country instead of running a circus.

[Alvin Walton]

Haha...no....
The American media in general was a joke way before Trump got into office.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Alvin Walton

Haha...no....
The American media in general was a joke way before Trump got into office.

LOL, ahhh no.it wasn't until the "alternative facts" crew took hold and started screaming fake news that the media was question .Thank God the media has stood firm in the unrelentless coverage of the Tangerine buffoon in the white house.It's their job to question the President and that is what they do.