04-16-2014, 10:58 PM | #646 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
Re: Pro-gun article
Bloomberg wastes more more. Good.
|
Advertisements |
04-16-2014, 11:09 PM | #647 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
Re: Pro-gun article
I've just added a Kimber .45 ACP
The difference is surprising. |
04-16-2014, 11:17 PM | #648 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
Re: Pro-gun article
|
04-17-2014, 12:31 PM | #649 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Beaverdam Virginia
Age: 63
Posts: 2,137
|
Re: Pro-gun article
Hopefully you can get ammo or don't shoot much. Everything I need they are always out of and I refuse to hang out in the parking lot on delivery day like a lot of people do. As long as a Democrat is in the White House the panic buying and high prices won't stop. Maybe I should start looking what ammo is always on the shelf and buy a gun to fit that.
|
04-17-2014, 07:59 PM | #650 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 13,903
|
Re: Pro-gun article
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread. |
04-17-2014, 08:05 PM | #651 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 13,903
|
Re: Pro-gun article
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread. |
04-17-2014, 08:47 PM | #652 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,335
|
Re: Pro-gun article
Quote:
Now I will go read the article, and see if I am right edit: read it, didn't really say but the more interesting thing is that this is from 20 Jan 2013. G1 you really are a troll in these threads... Shame, cuz football wise your posts are decent. |
|
04-17-2014, 08:54 PM | #653 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 13,903
|
Re: Pro-gun article
Quote:
Not a troll , the voice of reason to a small group of very unreasonable posters. As I have said before I respect your opinion but I disagree .
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread. |
|
04-17-2014, 08:55 PM | #654 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 13,903
|
Re: Pro-gun article
Not a waste ,an investment .
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread. |
04-19-2014, 08:58 AM | #655 |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: Pro-gun article
Glad there's signs that once in awhile you can think clearly. Though I think the poster maker didn't understand the subject matter any more than you do. This could be good. Broken clock, and all.
Re.the overall poster: So no blanket gun bans, gun restrictions, or gun taxes? Because you're not so stupid you're pissed at guns? Good. Re.1: Mandatory safety programs? Particularly if the government pays for them, this is very good. From teaching kids NOT to play with guns, to youth and adult handling and shooting training, a one time course would be good. Maybe offer it in high school. The only tricky part is "mandatory". No permanent gun registration should be kept, just records that a person has taken the course, should be good for background checks. And the safety courses must not be restrictively priced high or scarce to find, like the shenanigans DC pulled here. Edit: You know what, still too vulnerable to government abuse, and tying classes to the right to bear arms is unconstitutional. Best thing to do would be to make it a one-time mandatory class in elementary school, and highschool, a requirement for graduation. Re.2: Depends what you mean by "more thorough background checks". Enforcing existing laws better would be start. Re.3: Depends of what the definitions of "negligence" laws, like simply having a gun that's not locked in a safe, are a no-go. Tougher penalties on brandishing, using guns like Joe Biden recommended, etc., criminal misuse of guns, would be good though. So... glad to see some people coming around, I guess? Last edited by HailGreen28; 04-19-2014 at 09:26 AM. |
04-21-2014, 10:09 PM | #656 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
Re: Pro-gun article
|
04-22-2014, 05:12 AM | #657 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 13,903
|
Re: Pro-gun article
Comprehension has never been your strong point ,Thank you for reminding us .
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread. |
04-22-2014, 10:35 AM | #658 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
Why bother posting when you have nothing to say? You just confirm your idiocy.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk |
04-22-2014, 11:32 AM | #659 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Beaverdam Virginia
Age: 63
Posts: 2,137
|
Re: Pro-gun article
|
04-22-2014, 11:58 AM | #660 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
Exactly! If the fundamental understanding of firearms is so limited it's no surprise anti-gun people are terrified.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk |
|
|