11-04-2021, 03:20 PM | #31 | |
From a Land Down Under
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 53
Posts: 23,363
|
WFT vs. the bye week thread
Quote:
It isn’t about going back to week one during week 9. Hopefully you did your week one work back than. The statement he made is a very blanket statement. “We haven’t evaluated anything from first 8 weeks”. Huh? Even if Ron somehow made me understand that statement it falls directly under things u dont say when you are as bad and seemingly unprepared as we are. I know that the primary focus during the season is the upcoming game after Mondays film session but Matty you are telling me as a HC that is it? You are not evaluating your team as you go? Not thinking about roster moves, or changes, or anything else? It rings extremely oblivious to me. I want a HC who is constantly evaluating his team. Constantly looking at strengths and weaknesses and dead weight and free agents and everything all the time. Ron has plenty of time to plan for the upcoming game while evaluating the team. Im sorry if he doesn’t than gtfo. |
|
Advertisements |
11-04-2021, 03:25 PM | #32 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,416
|
Re: WFT vs. the bye week thread
Quote:
He's saying they haven't done a complete evaluation of the "season so far" overview. A mid term review so to speak. The same thing they do at the end of the season when the coaches all get together and evaluate the season as a whole. |
|
11-04-2021, 03:31 PM | #33 | |
From a Land Down Under
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 53
Posts: 23,363
|
Re: WFT vs. the bye week thread
Quote:
I think you are twisting this to feed your fondness for him. If Gruden had said this you would have simply said “Go figure” or “this fuckin guy”. Lol I dont need this simple statement to convince myself or others Ron is not a good coach. His losing seasons speak volumes about that. This statement is just the cherry on top. Like I said, when your team is never prepared and you continually say things like “we need to figure stuff out” well than this is going to draw some attention. At the very very least you have to admit this isn’t the best possible thing u can utter at this point. Im obviously not on an island here. When he does get around to evaluating this team I suggest he takes a long hard look in the mirror. |
|
11-04-2021, 03:35 PM | #34 | |
From a Land Down Under
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 53
Posts: 23,363
|
Re: WFT vs. the bye week thread
Quote:
Apparently this board not only thinks that is the case but it is the proper way to do things. Lol. Everyone can call me a Ron hater. Im a big boy. We all wanted/want him to succeed. But he was fired for a reason- losing, and will be fired again for losing. It sucks. Sometimes the truth sucks. |
|
11-04-2021, 03:39 PM | #35 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,662
|
Re: WFT vs. the bye week thread
Quote:
The evaluation i believe Ron be referring too we would call in my office as a "deep dive"; we even have "atomic deep dives" which literally make my eyes roll out of my head. Those dives are done quarterly or bi yearly. Otherwise we are reviewing data and moving along.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs! |
|
11-04-2021, 03:41 PM | #36 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,416
|
Re: WFT vs. the bye week thread
Quote:
Nobody has time for deep dive evaluations on a weekly basis. It's what the bye week is for. |
|
11-04-2021, 03:49 PM | #37 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 4,568
|
Re: WFT vs. the bye week thread
Have we talked about Chase Roullier's injury?
When we cut Keith Ismael (2020 5th rounder) in favor of 30 year old Tyler Larsen I had to talk myself into liking it thinking we are trying to win this year and if Chase gets hurt, we decided to go short term w the 30 year old vs long term with the youngster. Ismael was signed back to our active roster today so I guess no harm no foul. Glad we get to keep him but its a red flag the entire league said "nah" to adding him. |
11-04-2021, 03:51 PM | #38 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,416
|
Re: WFT vs. the bye week thread
Quote:
|
|
11-04-2021, 03:53 PM | #39 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,416
|
Re: WFT vs. the bye week thread
Quote:
|
|
11-04-2021, 03:55 PM | #40 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,416
|
Re: WFT vs. the bye week thread
Quote:
|
|
11-04-2021, 03:59 PM | #41 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,580
|
Re: WFT vs. the bye week thread
Should have everyone back but Chase after the bye right?
|
11-04-2021, 06:28 PM | #42 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 4,525
|
Re: WFT vs. the bye week thread
Bergstrom time.
__________________
Derz Ambassaderz in the Land of the Rising Sun. Oui Monsieur. |
11-04-2021, 07:24 PM | #43 |
From a Land Down Under
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 53
Posts: 23,363
|
Re: WFT vs. the bye week thread
|
11-04-2021, 07:34 PM | #44 |
From a Land Down Under
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 53
Posts: 23,363
|
Re: WFT vs. the bye week thread
Apparently Rivera is not trying out any kickers during the bye week. Wants to stick with Blewitt and give him time. For what? To see if he can get enough air under the ball to clear the crossbar? Wow. How in the hell are u not trying out any kicker who will try out?
|
11-04-2021, 07:47 PM | #45 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 4,525
|
Re: WFT vs. the bye week thread
Quote:
So either cutting Hopkins was about sending a some sort of weak message to the locker room... But now what message does keeping a guy obviously unable to do his job send ?! Or it was simply about trying to improve the position... In which case they are the worst kicker evaluating staff in sports history... Envoyé de mon SHV48 en utilisant Tapatalk
__________________
Derz Ambassaderz in the Land of the Rising Sun. Oui Monsieur. |
|
|
|