Presidential Race 2024

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Fishingfool

[/B]

So your saying Dems are too dumb to get an ID? OK, if you say so.

The eyes see what they want to see.

Keep fishing you fool.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Fishingfool

Hillary is still saying the election was stolen from her. Didn't Al Gore do the same thing?

https://www.npr.org/2016/11/09/50142...o-donald-trump

Yeah, I definitely remember Hillary screaming twice a week for the last 8 years that the election was stolen.

[nonniey]

Well, I called the Venezuela election accurately. But I'll admit that was a gimme. The opposition was up only 40 points Saturday when they needed to be up about 900 pts and have an army of their own to back that up. Guess we'll get another 500k-1.5m Venezuelan asylum seekers over the next 5 years.

[MTK]

Trump rage tweets incoming...

[mooby]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...-announcement/

In a perfect world we can all agree these 3 recommendations are very reasonable and would keep a harmonious balance on SCOTUS.

However this isn't a perfect world and conservatives are gonna take this as an attack on their SCOTUS majority so it will be met with a large outcry about Biden trying to rig SCOTUS.

I'll do you guys a solid and share the article here.

Originally Posted by Joey "biggest dickus" Biden

The writer is president of the United States.

This nation was founded on a simple yet profound principle: No one is above the law. Not the president of the United States. Not a justice on the Supreme Court of the United States. No one.

But the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision on July 1 to grant presidents broad immunity from prosecution for crimes they commit in office means there are virtually no limits on what a president can do. The only limits will be those that are self-imposed by the person occupying the Oval Office.

If a future president incites a violent mob to storm the Capitol and stop the peaceful transfer of power — like we saw on Jan. 6, 2021 — there may be no legal consequences.

And that’s only the beginning.

On top of dangerous and extreme decisions that overturn settled legal precedents — including Roe v. Wade — the court is mired in a crisis of ethics. Scandals involving several justices have caused the public to question the court’s fairness and independence, which are essential to faithfully carrying out its mission of equal justice under the law. For example, undisclosed gifts to justices from individuals with interests in cases before the court, as well as conflicts of interest connected with Jan. 6 insurrectionists, raise legitimate questions about the court’s impartiality.

I served as a U.S. senator for 36 years, including as chairman and ranking member of the Judiciary Committee. I have overseen more Supreme Court nominations as senator, vice president and president than anyone living today. I have great respect for our institutions and the separation of powers.

What is happening now is not normal, and it undermines the public’s confidence in the court’s decisions, including those impacting personal freedoms. We now stand in a breach.

That’s why — in the face of increasing threats to America’s democratic institutions — I am calling for three bold reforms to restore trust and accountability to the court and our democracy.

First, I am calling for a constitutional amendment called the No One Is Above the Law Amendment. It would make clear that there is no immunity for crimes a former president committed while in office. I share our Founders’ belief that the president’s power is limited, not absolute. We are a nation of laws — not of kings or dictators.

Second, we have had term limits for presidents for nearly 75 years. We should have the same for Supreme Court justices. The United States is the only major constitutional democracy that gives lifetime seats to its high court. Term limits would help ensure that the court’s membership changes with some regularity. That would make timing for court nominations more predictable and less arbitrary. It would reduce the chance that any single presidency radically alters the makeup of the court for generations to come. I support a system in which the president would appoint a justice every two years to spend 18 years in active service on the Supreme Court.

Third, I’m calling for a binding code of conduct for the Supreme Court. This is common sense. The court’s current voluntary ethics code is weak and self-enforced. Justices should be required to disclose gifts, refrain from public political activity and recuse themselves from cases in which they or their spouses have financial or other conflicts of interest. Every other federal judge is bound by an enforceable code of conduct, and there is no reason for the Supreme Court to be exempt.

All three of these reforms are supported by a majority of Americans — as well as conservative and liberal constitutional scholars. And I want to thank the bipartisan Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States for its insightful analysis, which informed some of these proposals.

We can and must prevent the abuse of presidential power. We can and must restore the public’s faith in the Supreme Court. We can and must strengthen the guardrails of democracy.

In America, no one is above the law. In America, the people rule.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by nonniey

Well, I called the Venezuela election accurately. But I'll admit that was a gimme. The opposition was up only 40 points Saturday when they needed to be up about 900 pts and have an army of their own to back that up. Guess we'll get another 500k-1.5m Venezuelan asylum seekers over the next 5 years.

They're so close to truly getting it

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by mooby

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...-announcement/

In a perfect world we can all agree these 3 recommendations are very reasonable and would keep a harmonious balance on SCOTUS.

However this isn't a perfect world and conservatives are gonna take this as an attack on their SCOTUS majority so it will be met with a large outcry about Biden trying to rig SCOTUS.

I'll do you guys a solid and share the article here.

Biden is irrelevant and was forced like the coward he is. This means nothing and the continuing attacks on the Supreme Court by dark money funded lobbyists and democrats is laughable

Go pound sand. You sit here and will lie simply because it’s a conservative court and not a liberal one. That’s all that really matters Mooby. Just say it

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Biden is irrelevant

No, you are. You're the coward you and your maga nazi friends . Your boss says if you vote this time you will never ever have to vote again! chico you're backing a asshole who admits to wanting to destroy America, if you back him then you're voting for it too.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Joe Biden, who has spent his whole life grifting off of U.S. taxpayers, all of the sudden wanting term-limits on anyone is beyond rich. What a shock, didn't hear him mention anything about term limits for U.S. Senators.

And there is a very specific reason why supreme court justices serve for life. But let's just ignore that fact.

That being said, I'm all for ratifying the Constitution to put in term limits for supreme court justices if you can get 75% of the states to vote for it.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Biden is irrelevant and was forced like the coward he is. This means nothing and the continuing attacks on the Supreme Court by dark money funded lobbyists and democrats is laughable



Go pound sand. You sit here and will lie simply because it’s a conservative court and not a liberal one. That’s all that really matters Mooby. Just say it

Actually Biden has more clout to go before the public and pitch over the next 4 months because it will be seen as less political and more belief. Does that mean he will get constitutional amendments passed, no but he can bring them to the forefront of the discussion and set a tone.

As for his actual points I do think age caps for all politicians makes a lot of sense, but 18 year terms for SC is too short. Maybe 25 years but you want consistency in the court not constant turnover.

Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

Joe Biden, who has spent his whole life grifting off of U.S. taxpayers, all of the sudden wanting term-limits on anyone is beyond rich. What a shock, didn't hear him mention anything about term limits for U.S. Senators.

And there is a very specific reason why supreme court justices serve for life. But let's just ignore that fact.

That being said, I'm all for ratifying the Constitution to put in term limits for supreme court justices if you can get 75% of the states to vote for it.

LOL, yeah you're not maga !

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by Giantone

LOL, yeah you're not maga !

I made my peace with you a few weeks ago, and my life is better for it. So use bold fonts, use color fonts, whatever you need to do, go for it. But I'm done arguing with you. Have a happy Tuesday.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

Joe Biden, who has spent his whole life grifting off of U.S. taxpayers, all of the sudden wanting term-limits on anyone is beyond rich. What a shock, didn't hear him mention anything about term limits for U.S. Senators.



And there is a very specific reason why supreme court justices serve for life. But let's just ignore that fact.



That being said, I'm all for ratifying the Constitution to put in term limits for supreme court justices if you can get 75% of the states to vote for it.

I agree with so much of this, But watching Ruth Bader Ginsburg stay in the court until she passed away Was too much. I think a constitutional amendment that brought sane term limits to every political political and government office is something this country definitely needs. It should address the Senate the house the Supreme Court and even government bureaucracy jobs. No one should be living off the government dole for life.

Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

I agree with so much of this, But watching Ruth Bader Ginsburg stay in the court until she passed away Was too much. I think a constitutional amendment that brought sane term limits to every political political and government office is something this country definitely needs. It should address the Senate the house the Supreme Court and even government bureaucracy jobs. No one should be living off the government dole for life.

Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk

Yeah, if you're putting term limits on the supreme court, you absolutely should have term limits for congress as well. Maybe congress can show some leadership and pass that for themselves 1st. But they ain't going to vote against their own self-interests.

I love the Constitution, so I will support every amendment that is legally passed, even if I don't initially agree w/ the actual amendment itself before it passes.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

Yeah, if you're putting term limits on the supreme court, you absolutely should have term limits for congress as well. Maybe congress can show some leadership and pass that for themselves 1st. But they ain't going to vote against their own self-interests.

I love the Constitution, so I will support every amendment that is legally passed.

Horse shit!