|
|
|||||||
| Fantasy Football Discuss all fantasy football related matters here |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-26-2006, 08:10 PM
|
#1 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 7
|
Trade Issues
Ok i was offered two trades this week and I still have been thinking about doing them. I need help to determine which one I should do, if any.
Here is my team: Qb:Rex Grossman rb: Tomlinson rb: Mcallister wr: Chambers wr: Driver wr: Bryant te: Heath miller k: Nedney D: Vikings bn: Barlow bn: Cotchery bn: Desmond Clark bn: Givens bn: Warner One team offered me Steven Jackson, David Carr, and Miami defense for Tomlinson and Warner. Another team offered me Ronnie Brown, Reggie Bush, and Arizona just for Tomlinson. Which one you guys think I should do, if any? |
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
09-26-2006, 08:35 PM
|
#2 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,249
|
Re: Trade Issues
I don't like either of those trades.
Tomlinson is a fantasy football beast. Steven Jackson and David carr isnt an upgrade over Tomlinson and Grossman. and the addition of the defence means nothing really, It depends on who they are playing... Ronnie Brown and Bush is kinda interesting because it would give you depth at RB, Which you need. But both those guys wont be as consistent as LT. LT almost gaurantees you 80 Yards rushing, 20 Yards Receiving and 1 TD every week. Maybe my asking price is unrealistic but I would ask for a 1st round WR and a First round rb for LT. also, I dont like 3 for 1 trades because of the limited roster spots. you will basicly have to drop Viks D for arizona and probably barlow... Hold out for superstars, unless someone gets hurt and you're desperate. But thats just my opinion. I should mention that im getting my ass handed to me in my fantasy football league... |
|
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 08:52 PM
|
#3 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Trade Issues
No deal. Never deal a fantasy stud for equal parts. You have to get a comparable player from another position. Tomlinson is the surest thing this year now with LJ situation and Alexander out. I can't think of any reasonable deal that you'd even get.
|
|
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 10:11 PM
|
#4 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
|
Re: Trade Issues
Neither seem very good to me. Remember, barring injury you'll have LT for the rest of the season b/c he just had his bye, so depth shouldn't be too much of an issue. Plus, neither of those DEFs seem to be too good, in fact, they're probably on waivers in most leagues right now.
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude |
|
|
|
|
09-27-2006, 10:10 AM
|
#5 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 41
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Trade Issues
LT is past his bye week and doesn't get hurt. you don't need the depth since they won't put up as many points (LT gets TDs AND yardage, RB gets TDs, bush gets yardage).
don't do it. |
|
|
|
|
09-27-2006, 10:28 AM
|
#6 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,508
|
Re: Trade Issues
Doesn't look favorable (fair?) for you to me either. LT is what I call "guaranteed points"; you need someone in return that's somewhat comparable at another position plus a 2nd/3rd-tier RB.
__________________
"I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn |
|
|
|
|
09-27-2006, 10:42 AM
|
#7 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Trade Issues
Ditto everyone.
|
|
|
|
|
09-27-2006, 11:18 AM
|
#8 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Frederick, MD
Age: 45
Posts: 4,628
|
Re: Trade Issues
Keep LT. Dump Warner if you can.
__________________
Bad Things man, I mean bad things... “WE TOOK HIM IN THE SIXTH ROUND SO WE'RE NOT SMART EITHER.” - Shanny on what the Skins saw in Alfred Morris |
|
|
|
|
09-27-2006, 02:31 PM
|
#9 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Trade Issues
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
