|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-30-2018, 10:46 AM | #16 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,335
|
Re: 3 year review : 2013-2016 Drafts
tl;dr It's easier to criticize our own teams drafting, but comparing to other teams, imo, shows that it was pretty damn good.
Here is Seattle's equivalent (I used them based on Schneed's Richard Sherman example) 2013 2 62 SEA Christine Michael RB (current Colts) 3 87 SEA Jordan Hill DT (current IR Lions) 4 123 SEA Chris Harper WR (out of league -OOL)) 5 158 SEA Luke Willson TE (current Lions) 5 138 SEA Tharold Simon DB (OOL) 5 137 SEA Jesse Williams DT (OOL) 6 194 SEA Spencer Ware RB (current KC) 7 242 SEA Michael Bowie T (OOL) 7 241 SEA Jared Smith DT (OOL) 7 220 SEA Ryan Seymour G (OOL) 2014 2 64 SEA Justin Britt T Current SEA 2 45 SEA Paul Richardson WR Current WAS 4 132 SEA Kevin Pierre-Louis LB Current NYJ 4 123 SEA Kevin Norwood WR OOL 4 108 SEA Cassius Marsh DE current SF 5 172 SEA Jimmy Staten DT OOL 6 208 SEA Eric Pinkins DB OOL 6 199 SEA Garrett Scott OL OOL 7 227 SEA Kiero Small RB OOL 2015 2 63 SEA Frank Clark DE Current SEA 3 69 SEA Tyler Lockett WR Current SEA 4 134 SEA Mark Glowinski G Current IND 4 130 SEA Terry Poole G OOL 5 170 SEA Tye Smith CB Current TEN 6 214 SEA Kristjan Sokoli DT Current NYG 6 209 SEA Obum Gwacham DE Current NYJ 7 248 SEA Ryan Murphy DB Current NYJ So their equivalent players on roster for those 3 years are: 3 on roster out of 27 picks (or for Jamf's 2 year note, 1 out of 17 picks for 2013-2014) Tyler Lockett strikes me as their main standout 13 of 27, or just under 50% are out of the league All 3 years they traded their first round picks (none of the resulting players are on their team -- Percy Harvin, Jimmy Graham, Kyle Van Noy, Cassius Marsh Interestingly Paul Richardson was picked 2 spots ahead of Trent Murphy both moved on because the drafting team didn't want to keep them |
Advertisements |
03-30-2018, 12:33 PM | #17 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,249
|
Re: 3 year review : 2013-2016 Drafts
These bad drafts are part of the reason why they have been on the decline.
Seattle built their Super Bowl teams from picks after the second round who became pro bowlers. Quote:
|
|
03-30-2018, 12:35 PM | #18 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,249
|
Re: 3 year review : 2013-2016 Drafts
We got nothing out of the Murphy pick and we traded with Dallas and gave them a pro bowl pass rusher. It’s not s good pick any way you spin it.
Quote:
|
|
03-30-2018, 12:40 PM | #19 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,335
|
Re: 3 year review : 2013-2016 Drafts
|
03-30-2018, 12:48 PM | #20 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 4,525
|
Re: 3 year review : 2013-2016 Drafts
Quote:
Envoyé de mon SM-J320FN en utilisant Tapatalk
__________________
Derz Ambassaderz in the Land of the Rising Sun. Oui Monsieur. |
|
03-30-2018, 01:20 PM | #21 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,335
|
Re: 3 year review : 2013-2016 Drafts
|
03-30-2018, 02:01 PM | #22 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,335
|
Re: 3 year review : 2013-2016 Drafts
A few different sites rankings:
None of these are definitive but to give a general flavor: https://nypost.com/2017/04/22/studyi...ms-at-picking/ They rank us 7 over the past 5 years ( They have the Seahawks at number 5) https://ftw.usatoday.com/2017/04/nfl...sses-2012-2016 They have us at number 5, Seahawks at Number 1 https://www.forbes.com/sites/chrissm.../#34977d0d5dcd They have us at 16, Seahawks at 2 https://www.foxsports.com/nfl/galler...present-030117 They have us at 9, Seahawks at 12. https://www.profootballfocus.com/new...by-draft-class They rank us 12th, Seahawks 3rd I guess the point of this is that ranking drafting is a pretty damn subjective task. The Skins FO isn't perfect at it, BUT to say that they can't get anything past the 20th pick like you said at one time is not very realistic understanding of how difficult NFL drafting really is. |
03-30-2018, 06:39 PM | #23 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,249
|
Re: 3 year review : 2013-2016 Drafts
Quote:
Defensive player of the week - 2 Defensive player of the month - 1 Pro bowls - 1 Double digit sack seasons - 1 Player A: Roid suspensions- 1 |
|
03-30-2018, 06:42 PM | #24 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,335
|
Re: 3 year review : 2013-2016 Drafts
Quote:
You can hate on the FO, it's subjective enough and they aren't an elite team, but they aren't incompetent either. |
|
03-30-2018, 06:55 PM | #25 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,249
|
Re: 3 year review : 2013-2016 Drafts
Quote:
It’s all about wins. Redskins win loss record is mediocre just like their drafts. |
|
03-30-2018, 07:01 PM | #26 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,335
|
Re: 3 year review : 2013-2016 Drafts
That is a false equivalence. There are a lot of factors as to how a team does in the win loss records. The Eagles by all accounts have drafted terribly The Last 5 Years yet they won the Super Bowl. Our drafting has been average to above-average our injuries have been higher, our QB situation / drama has been higher, I would say our coaching has been average, and our win loss record is average or medium. I doubt it's the drafting because you can look at the history and see how the players have panned out and by and large the Redskins drafted players have panned out in the NFL. There are a lot of other factors.
|
03-30-2018, 07:03 PM | #27 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,249
|
Re: 3 year review : 2013-2016 Drafts
Quote:
The Redskins aren’t going to pay him $7mil per year to backup Smith. Wasted a 2nd round pick for a guy who maxed out at 9 sacks while on steroids. |
|
03-31-2018, 08:48 AM | #28 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 4,525
|
Re: 3 year review : 2013-2016 Drafts
Quote:
Envoyé de mon SM-J320FN en utilisant Tapatalk
__________________
Derz Ambassaderz in the Land of the Rising Sun. Oui Monsieur. |
|
|
|