|
Debating with the enemy Discuss politics, current events, and other hot button issues here. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-06-2017, 11:15 PM | #301 |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,428
|
Re: What would it take?
I just realized I never answered the original question. What would it take for me to trust Donald's vision and plan for America?
1. He would have to admit he isn't the smartest expert of them all, and that he is open to hearing the argument as to why global warming exists. He doesn't have to admit it, he just needs to say "hey I recognize there are better experts on the subject than myself" and at the same time be open to new ideas. 2. At the same time, that idea applies to mostly everything he does. If he came out and said he will lean on the judgement of his advisors and he is only as good as the people around him I would give him credit for that. Personally I hate his advisers (minus a couple) but that's a discussion for another day. This is more about Trump admitting his shortcomings and accepting that he can't be the savior all by himself. 3. Abandon the wall idea, and put that money to better use. More agents, more technology, I'm all in favor of supporting ICE and the Border Patrol. A wall is not a good use of that money. 4. Rather than (paraphrasing here) tell the public you are going to get rid of every Obama accomplishment you can, why not just say "everything will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis." He looks like an idiot that's willing to sign anything thrown on his desk without evaluating it first. That would be it for starters. If I want to get all nitpicky I could write an even longer list but we all know none of this shit is happening anyways. That man loves stroking his own ego. He could be a total failure and still come out after leaving office talking about "I am the greatest President in American history." "He is a modern day George Washington, MLK, and Ghandi rolled into one - Donald J. Trump"
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
Advertisements |
02-07-2017, 11:21 AM | #302 | |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,225
|
Re: What would it take?
Quote:
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
02-07-2017, 11:42 AM | #303 | |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,299
|
Re: What would it take?
Quote:
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
02-08-2017, 02:10 AM | #304 | |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,428
|
Re: What would it take?
Quote:
Not just that but why not use that money to expand the fleet, put more boots on the ground, throw in more motion sensors, maybe develop or even expand technology that helps them detect tunnels (which are already a major source of contraband coming north). Thanks. Nice edit btw, . I gave up on the Drumpf name a while ago, it seems like nobody cares about that one. Glad to see somebody is still using it.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
02-08-2017, 07:38 AM | #305 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,299
|
Re: What would it take?
What's the excuse to immigrate legally?
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
02-08-2017, 10:00 AM | #306 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,299
|
Re: What would it take?
Obama famously told Eric Cantor in a private meeting that "elections have consequences" after the Democrats won the White House and controlled Congress.Nov 5, 2014
yes they do
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
02-08-2017, 10:12 AM | #307 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,335
|
Re: What would it take?
The Senate Republicans are absolutely a stupid group, why cut off Warren's ramble in the middle of the night. Let them talkety talk talk talk, then once done. Vote and be done with it. Nope, instead, let's cut her off in the middle of a letter from MLK's wife. Idiots.
|
02-08-2017, 09:56 PM | #308 |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,428
|
Re: What would it take?
I think the reason so many don't wait to immigrate legally is because it is an already complicated and overwhelming process that often takes a long time. Imagine living in one of those border cities in Mexico where the death toll is insane thanks to the constant fighting, hell I'm sure there are families that have already seen too much death on a regular basis. Should they have to wait a year or two or however long it takes to process the application and go through the vetting? On top of that they might have already tried and gotten turned down. Then what? I guess they are just stuck living in whatever cartel dominated country they reside in, and they just have to live their lives hoping a stray bullet doesn't catch them on the way to the grocery store?
Point is, are we really going to sit here and act like our legal immigration system isn't overwhelmed with applications? Look at the state of the rest of the world. Why doesn't Trump fix that instead of building a wall?
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
02-09-2017, 10:05 AM | #309 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,335
|
Re: What would it take?
Quote:
1) seriously - why doesn't Trump fix the state of the rest of the world? 2) I agree our legal immigration ought to be simplified and expanded - in other words the Statue of Liberty quote ought to be exemplified by our immigration policies, not by immigrants breaking our laws to get into the country. 3) Even with a liberalized immigration policy you can't offer enough legal immigration to solve the problem by itself. 4) Walls work but it's not the end all be all solution. The fact of the matter is that even in this day and age, walls/fences/security structures work. We don't build prisons without walls and fences because the bad guys will just find another way. Most people put a fence around the property line, not because it's an end all solution, but because you define the line. You say people will find other ways, and while that's true, you still block off vast amounts of avenues simply with a wall that has basic security enhancements - motion sensor, ground radar, and cameras.bottomline, no one solution is going to solve the problems at our southern border, but an effective wall, better use of technology, and an appropriate immigration policy would go a long way to reducing the issue. |
|
02-09-2017, 10:24 AM | #310 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,335
|
Re: What would it take?
One other point on immigration, from a Telegraph article,
In 2015, the US had 46million legal immigrants (11million illegal - estimated) The next closest countries were Germany and Russia which had about 12million each. Canada has 7.8 million. We have nearly as many undocumented/illegal immigrants as the next closest countries have legal. I can't understand for the life of me, why trying to protect the borders with a physical demarcation is in anyway a bad thing. The closest I get to understanding is the cost argument, but how many people don't pay the cost to put up a fence. Out of all the tasks assigned to our government that they want to pay for, border security seems to me like it fits at the top of the constitutional list of Federal obligations. ( and yes I'd be ok with delaying a few nuclear subs/f-35 fighter jets to help defray the initial cost, and then use tariffs/fees and other methods to recoup the total expenses) |
02-09-2017, 11:52 AM | #311 | |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,299
|
Re: What would it take?
Quote:
The main reason folks are crossing illegally is Cartel violence? Mooby, buddy.....I gotta give you the "come on man!" for this post. If there is any restrictions directly from Mexico or problems, its caused by the Mexican Government and there own problem with illegal immigration. Remember, a lot of folks are illegally crossing over from central and south America into Mexico to then travel to the US border only to be trafficked into the US illegally or crossing over themselves. If its any delay its trying to vet IDs, nationalities, etc. Our legal immigration policy is fine...I don't think there is an issue. Sorry, but 9/11 changed a lot of things, but we still do a tremendous job in accepting a lot of people into this country...which IM 110% for.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
02-09-2017, 01:13 PM | #312 | |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,428
|
Re: What would it take?
Quote:
The worst that happens is you will get deported if you get caught, barring you having a criminal record of course. People's lives are at stake. The drug war in Mexico has claimed huge amounts of lives, some of which are certainly innocent people caught in the crossfire. South American countries have no jobs, no hope, rampant corruption, a weak economy, violence from various factions, and you think people should just suck it up and play the legal waiting game? I get it Chico, you got your own problems and your own shit to deal with, who fucking cares about their problems until they come to your country and make it your problem? That's the burden of being the main country on Earth where everyone who doesn't live here thinks is the solution to their problems.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
02-09-2017, 01:38 PM | #313 | |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,299
|
Re: What would it take?
Quote:
What about the tax money we spend to provide services to illegals? What about all the money made here to support the Mexican economy back home?
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
02-09-2017, 05:06 PM | #314 | |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,428
|
Re: What would it take?
Quote:
Back to the original point at hand, you are lying to yourself if you think families and people come to America from 3rd world countries thinking "who cares about this place, it's just a paycheck." It's not just a paycheck. It's a better life. It's knowing your kids can play in the street without being exposed to violence. It's still a hard life, but it's almost certainly better then the one they left behind. It's just a goddamn shame you lump them in with the illegal immigrants that come here solely on behalf of whatever gang/cartel they represent, and are basically looking for easy money selling drugs/human trafficking/etc. Those are the ones we should be focusing on getting rid of, not the hard working families trying to raise their kids on a decent paycheck. It's not as black and white as you want to make it out. And don't even start on terrorist Muslims getting in, lord knows more mass murder incidents have happened in America since 9/11 by the hand of insane white people. Why doesn't he ban Saudi Arabia immigrants from coming here, since 19 of those fuckers were responsible for 9/11? What about Egyptian immigrants? What's the excuse for them? I get it, you want immigrants to come here legally and pay taxes like the rest of us. I would fucking love it if that happened too. But here's my final question. If Trump truly makes America great again, what do you think is going to happen? Right now the idea that America is the greatest country on Earth is just an illusion, and they're still coming in. Imagine if we truly were the greatest country on Earth again, people from every 3rd world country out there would be pouring in by the boatload. We'd make the immigrant situation in Europe look like nothing in comparison.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
02-10-2017, 09:24 AM | #315 | |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,299
|
Re: What would it take?
Quote:
And when you mention tax money wasted, of course it is. Look at the growth of government...We def need less government at every level...Federal, State, and local.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|