Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Off-Topic Discussion > Debating with the enemy

Debating with the enemy Discuss politics, current events, and other hot button issues here.


Winning

Debating with the enemy


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-05-2018, 09:08 PM   #11
Giantone
Gamebreaker
 
Giantone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 13,903
Re: Winning

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post
Your nominee lied on the stand about his drinking habits and terms commonly used in those days. His former friends and roommates literally said they had witnessed him blackout drunk on multiple occasions.

What kind of judge lies under oath? The one who knows he's going to get backed by the ruling party unless something absolutely damning comes out.

I never mentioned the Avenatti bitch because nobody credible was taking her seriously.

I never even said I believe his accuser, because I wasn't fucking there and have no idea if it happened.

All I said was a federal judge lied under oath about his drinking based off the knowledge of those who hung out with him in those days.

The President chose to have the FBI investigation because he could control the FBI investigation. Why does the FBI investigation even matter when he shits on them daily for investigating him? One minute they're dogshit, but they're totally credible when investigating her claims? Get the fuck out of here.

I concede it was a political hit job. I also say if that it did happen, do you really think Ford should've kept her mouth shut when the guy she says did it is being nominated to a lifetime post in the highest court of the land?

The problem with sexual assault allegations is unless there's a witness or DNA evidence, it's word against word. Her accusation was doomed from the start because she has neither.

And yes, I do believe when all your former friends from college are saying you had a rep for being a blackout drunk who got feisty, and that you're lying under oath for a job interview for a lifetime position of power over a nation, that political hit jobs are necessary.

When Senate Republicans are adamant that 6-8 months or whatever time it was between Garland gets nominated and they even refuse to consider him saying they don't have enough time, yet turn around the next year and try to speed rush a fucking SC justice through before the midterms in one month because they're afraid of losing the majority, can me & mine afford to sit back and play by their rules? The rules change depending on what's necessary for the ruling party to maintain power. It's bullshit.

But the worst bullshit is that come November, every goddamn Republican is going to head to the polls while my friends stay at fucking home because no matter what I or anyone say, they think their vote doesn't fucking matter.

But why do you give a fuck?

As long as the economy keeps growing you and Cred are in the black baby!
+1,
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread.
Giantone is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 7.36146 seconds with 11 queries