|
Debating with the enemy Discuss politics, current events, and other hot button issues here. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
01-11-2013, 11:46 AM | #1 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
Name Change.......again.
It must be the offseason as this comes up with monotonous regularity:
Redskins Name Change Discussion Necessary, Says D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray “I think that if they get serious with the team coming back to Washington, there’s no doubt there’s going to have to be a discussion about that,” Gray said, according to the Washington Post. "I think it has become a lightning rod, and I would be love to be able to sit down with the team … and see if a change should be made. There’s a precedent for this, and I think there needs to be a dispassionate discussion about this, and do the right thing.” Amusingly, the article sets up the argument thus: For decades, the team name has been a controversial issue. Some call the "Redskins" moniker nothing short of a racial slur. Others argue that the team's name, which dates back to the 1930s, is tradition and does not need to be changed. So "It's racist" is countered by the equivalent of "We don't care". |
01-11-2013, 12:41 PM | #2 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: Name Change.......again.
Vincent Gray can eat the fuzzies outa my butt crack.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
01-11-2013, 03:05 PM | #3 | |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Name Change.......again.
Quote:
But quite honestly, I don't care. I've never once said "Redskins" in a way where I in the least considered it a slight or an insult to a race. If I had to choose between going to Maryland (which is something I really hate regardless of the reason) for a Redskins game and DC for a Washington Warriors game... give me PG county...
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
|
01-11-2013, 04:57 PM | #4 |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: Name Change.......again.
It wasn't a racist name when founded, it wasn't when it was chosen as a name for people to root FOR, it isn't now except by the same small number of people who want to ban it.
Lovely article, when only one side's arguments are honestly reported. |
01-12-2013, 08:59 AM | #5 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,525
|
The name was chosen to honor rather than degrade. I wish these handful of people would quit making a fuss about nothing. It gets old hearing this same discussion every year which never garners any real support.
|
01-17-2013, 04:37 PM | #6 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: Name Change.......again.
it worked for academi...
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81 |
07-23-2013, 08:10 AM | #7 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: Name Change.......again.
It looks like Art Monk and Darryl Green think the name should be changed since it offensive to others. I heard them speaking about it on WTOP driving into the office this morning.
|
|
|