Better end of the trade

SlabHurta · 10-26-2006, 10:33 PM

Who do think got the better end of this trade?
I offered a guy in my league Tomlinson, Chester Taylor, Delhomme, and Chambers for Barber, Westbrook, Brees, and Holt. I would think I got the better end of that trade. What do you guys think?

steveo395 · 10-26-2006, 11:15 PM

you got the better end

That Guy · 10-27-2006, 05:48 AM

1 stud for 3 studs. you win.

GhettoDogAllStars · 10-27-2006, 09:33 AM

Awww, that dude got ripped off

Daseal · 10-27-2006, 12:03 PM

Taylor has been a stud this year.

Anyhow, you got the better end. Depends on how deep that guy was at WR, mighta been better for both of you. Just remember, Tiki doesn't score TDs.

Schneed10 · 10-27-2006, 12:25 PM

First question, why the effity-eff would someone trade 2 RBs, 1 QB, and 1 WR for 2 RBs, 1 QB, and 1 WR???

Obviously you would want to do it, because this dude decided to just hand you a title. But what the eff was he thinking???

jdlea · 10-27-2006, 12:30 PM

I'm gonna be honest, I hate that deal for you. I never trade LT, especially not when it's Taylor and LT for Tiki and Westbrook. The Chambers for Holt is a huge upgrade, but not big enough to give up LT. And Delhomme is probably less consistent than Brees, but Delhomme and Smith are lethal, so I wouldn't have done it.

That Guy · 10-27-2006, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdlea

I'm gonna be honest, I hate that deal for you. I never trade LT, especially not when it's Taylor and LT for Tiki and Westbrook. The Chambers for Holt is a huge upgrade, but not big enough to give up LT. And Delhomme is probably less consistent than Brees, but Delhomme and Smith are lethal, so I wouldn't have done it.

in the leagues i've been in, i believe westbrook is leading LT in points... so i wouldn't be that concerned.

jdlea · 10-27-2006, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by That Guy

in the leagues i've been in, i believe westbrook is leading LT in points... so i wouldn't be that concerned.

Really?! That's surprising, but I guess the receiving yards are big. I just always worry about Westbrook getting injured, being inconsistent, and Reid not running the damn ball.

Schneed10 · 10-27-2006, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdlea

Really?! That's surprising, but I guess the receiving yards are big. I just always worry about Westbrook getting injured, being inconsistent, and Reid not running the damn ball.

Yep, Tomlinson and Westbrook are the top 2 non-QB performers in just about any league.

It's about total yards from scrimmage.

GhettoDogAllStars · 10-27-2006, 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdlea

Really?! That's surprising, but I guess the receiving yards are big. I just always worry about Westbrook getting injured, being inconsistent, and Reid not running the damn ball.

definitely. westbrook has issues (he's always questionable), but right now he's unstoppable. that's the only thing I'd be worried about: westy and holt have been going-off so far -- it's hard to expect them to keep it up all season.

TheMalcolmConnection · 10-27-2006, 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GhettoDogAllStars

definitely. westbrook has issues (he's always questionable), but right now he's unstoppable. that's the only thing I'd be worried about: westy and holt have been going-off so far -- it's hard to expect them to keep it up all season.

Westbrook is the perfect example of being used correctly in the system. For ANY other team (with the Falcons being the exception), he wouldn't do CRAP. It's McNabb's mobility that allows Westbrook so much room to run.

That Guy · 10-27-2006, 12:31 PM

basically no matter how hard you argue the merits, you basically got holt for free.

724Skinsfan · 10-27-2006, 12:58 PM

The only way that this trade can be considered close is that Westbrook isn't durable and also he still has a BYE week coming up.

I think you got the better end of the deal assuming production from all players involved stays relatively constant.

FRPLG · 10-27-2006, 02:19 PM

You stole from him seriously. Player for player you won easily 3 times and only the LT/Westbrook trade merits discussion.

Barber > Taylor...easily
Holt > Chambers...easily
Brees > Delhomme...this is closer but still Brees has been clearly better
LT > Westbrook...pretty debatable. Either guy is a stud. Basically a wash.

I can't believe the deal got ok'd through your league.

10-26-2006, 10:33 PM	#1
SlabHurta Camp Scrub Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 21	Better end of the trade Who do think got the better end of this trade? I offered a guy in my league Tomlinson, Chester Taylor, Delhomme, and Chambers for Barber, Westbrook, Brees, and Holt. I would think I got the better end of that trade. What do you guys think?

10-26-2006, 11:15 PM	#2
steveo395 The Starter Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: New Jersey Posts: 1,674	Re: Better end of the trade you got the better end __________________

10-27-2006, 05:48 AM	#3
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 41 Posts: 17,553	Re: Better end of the trade 1 stud for 3 studs. you win.

10-27-2006, 09:33 AM	#4
GhettoDogAllStars Playmaker Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Denver Age: 42 Posts: 2,762	Re: Better end of the trade Awww, that dude got ripped off __________________ To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered.

10-27-2006, 12:03 PM	#5
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 41 Posts: 8,341	Re: Better end of the trade Taylor has been a stud this year. Anyhow, you got the better end. Depends on how deep that guy was at WR, mighta been better for both of you. Just remember, Tiki doesn't score TDs. __________________ Best. Player. Available.

10-27-2006, 12:25 PM	#6
Schneed10 A Dude Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 45 Posts: 12,421	Re: Better end of the trade First question, why the effity-eff would someone trade 2 RBs, 1 QB, and 1 WR for 2 RBs, 1 QB, and 1 WR??? Obviously you would want to do it, because this dude decided to just hand you a title. But what the eff was he thinking??? __________________ God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.

10-27-2006, 12:30 PM	#7
jdlea Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, VA Age: 40 Posts: 3,109	Re: Better end of the trade I'm gonna be honest, I hate that deal for you. I never trade LT, especially not when it's Taylor and LT for Tiki and Westbrook. The Chambers for Holt is a huge upgrade, but not big enough to give up LT. And Delhomme is probably less consistent than Brees, but Delhomme and Smith are lethal, so I wouldn't have done it.

10-27-2006, 12:31 PM	#13
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 41 Posts: 17,553	Re: Better end of the trade basically no matter how hard you argue the merits, you basically got holt for free.

10-27-2006, 12:58 PM	#14
724Skinsfan Playmaker Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Roanoke, VA Posts: 3,508	Re: Better end of the trade The only way that this trade can be considered close is that Westbrook isn't durable and also he still has a BYE week coming up. I think you got the better end of the deal assuming production from all players involved stays relatively constant. __________________ "I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn

10-27-2006, 02:19 PM	#15
FRPLG MVP Join Date: May 2004 Age: 46 Posts: 10,164	Re: Better end of the trade You stole from him seriously. Player for player you won easily 3 times and only the LT/Westbrook trade merits discussion. Barber > Taylor...easily Holt > Chambers...easily Brees > Delhomme...this is closer but still Brees has been clearly better LT > Westbrook...pretty debatable. Either guy is a stud. Basically a wash. I can't believe the deal got ok'd through your league.

Better end of the trade

Fantasy Football